Pen
The fascination of
words and writing
 

The Writing Life

How to Critique Others’ Writing

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

Today’s blog post is by my esteemed colleague and friend, Carter Jefferson.

The number one rule for critiques is derived from one you may have heard before: Critique as you would be critiqued. You wouldn’t want people telling you your story is no damn good, so don’t do it to other people, no matter what.

The first thing to say about a piece is what you liked about it–the idea, a character, the plot, a glittering piece of writing, whatever. Find something you liked, and mention it.

Don’t say only “I liked it!” or “It’s beautiful!” Figure out what made it good or bad, if you can, and talk about that.

Tell the writer whether you liked the story as a whole or not. Did it move you? Make you laugh? Make you cry? Leave you cold? Overall, what stood out, good or bad? Whether you liked the story or not, what could be done to improve it?

Talk about the writing style. Was the style too flowery, or too pedestrian? Too cute? Were the sentences overlong, or too short? Were they all similar, so they became monotonous?

What about the structure? Do the parts of the story follow in the right order? Did you learn something way down that you should have known sooner? Does the story go at breakneck speed, leaving you breathless? Or is it just too slow? Was the piece overwritten–that is, should it be cut? Where? What’s not necessary? What actually detracts? Was it too short? Did you need more information about something?

How did the characters strike you? Did you like the hero, hate the villain? How about nuances? Did the characters seem alive? How could the writer have made you feel more deeply with the characters?

Does the setting seem real? Can you feel the place? Settings matter.

You can do a line-by-line critique if you want; you don’t have to, but it’s good to show examples of things you think need to be improved.

A good critique takes time and thought. Remember, that’s what you want your stories to get–give it to those of others.

When someone critiques one of your pieces, say thank you nicely, even if you think the critique was stupid–you’ve at least learned how stupid people will view it. Take the good suggestions, and ignore the not so good. If nobody likes it, it needs work. If half love the piece and half hate it, that’s fine, for tastes differ. Don’t feel bad if there’s plenty
wrong with it; nothing’s perfect, and you can make it better. If a critique hurts, that’s okay; you’ll survive. Nobody has a thick skin, even those who say they do.

Want to learn more? Carter Jefferson’s wisdom is accessible at his website. He lives in Boston and has been a reporter and copy editor on a metropolitan daily, a Navy officer, a professor of history, and a family therapist. He started writing professionally when he was 15 on a local ethnic newspaper, and has never stopped. Officially retired, he now writes fiction, memoirs, and essays for e-zines, and teaches creative writing to the senior set at U.Mass./Boston.

So check out his work, and then you’ll be … beyond the elements of style!

Improve Your Freelance Business with a Performance Review

Wednesday, April 4th, 2012

Okay, so I have business on the brain right now. Tax time is always a time to review last year’s goals and performance, and it’s a good time to take stock of how your freelance business is performing.

I remember when I left the land of cubicles and fluorescent lighting, I was particularly pleased that I would no longer be subjected to performance reviews. It took a couple of years on my own to realize that they’re even more necessary in a freelance business than in the corporate one, because the bottom line is your bottom line!

So if you set up a quarterly performance review for yourself, you’ll find that you have a much better sense of how you’re doing, where your strengths are, and how you can improve. Here are five steps you can take to review your own performance and improve your freelance business:

  1. Ask yourself the hard questions. What did I set out to do during this quarter?
    What actually happened … what were the actual results? Why did these results occur? What am I going to do to improve performance during the next quarter?
  2. Based on your answers to those questions, make a list of wins (places where you met or exceeded your goals) and losses (places where you fell short). Obviously I am assuming that you do in fact have planned out goals, written them down, referred to them consistently. If you haven’t, then that’s your first task here!
  3. Take your two lists and analyze them. Are these goals still relevant? If not, adjust them. What caused your failures? What caused your successes? How can you transfer more items from the losses column to the wins column?
  4. Write out a plan that incorporates the goals you need to accomplish during the next quarter.
  5. Now look at the reasons for your losses. This is the hardest part of your personal performance review. Were some of them under your control? Did laziness, lack of attention, not enough focus come into play? Whatever it was, this is something for you to target for the next quarter and bear in mind as you examine its goals.

Don’t forget also to reward yourself for the wins … a good performance review notes both success and failure. And then you’ll be … beyond the elements of style!

It’s Not a Suggestion!

Monday, March 5th, 2012

On Sunday, I wrote my daily writing tip about submission guidelines, and felt as I did that it’s probably worth spending more time with it than the couple of short paragraphs allowed in a Facebook update.

Here’s the point of it all: when a publisher posts submission guidelines, they’re not suggestions. They’re not something you might try if you’re not feeling particularly creative today. They’re not even something the publisher dreamed up solely to make your life difficult. There’s actually a pretty good reason that they were written as they were, and following them shows the publisher a number of things:

  1. you’re bright enough to follow directions
  2. you know how to read
  3. you won’t be troublesome down the line as you’re willing to enter the publisher’s turf and play by the publisher’s rules.

Don’t like the guidelines? That’s your right. But move on. Find someone else whose guidelines you do like.

A couple of months ago a colleague and I decided to create a couple of anthologies. Here are the guidelines that we sent out:

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS FOR A HOLIDAY ANTHOLOGY

Imagine your favorite holiday stories. Chances are good the protagonists are a man and a woman, possibly even with children. But where are the stories that feature men together, or women together, that will also warm our hearts at this special season?

That’s where you come in. We’re collecting holiday stories for two anthologies, one featuring male protagonists/couples/families, the other featuring female protagonists/couples/families, and we’d like to hear from you!

Your story should run between 2,000 and 4,000 words, contain no erotica, and be in a winter holiday setting. The only requirement is that it be historical fiction. We’re looking for tomorrow’s classics in time for next year’s holiday season!

Pay will depend on securing a publisher and will be negotiated at that time for accepted stories. Deadline is June 15, 2012, but the earlier, the better. Send Word docs to Jeannine Allard at jeannine@jeannineallard.com.

If you were reading that, you may have picked up on three relevant points. We’re looking for:

  • LGBT stories
  • historical fiction
  • winter themes

I didn’t think it was that difficult to read. But I got deluged with stories about cousins, pets, grandmothers, and straight couples. Stories that were situated in the future or on another planet. Stories written by people who clearly hadn’t even bothered to read the entire call for submissions, but who just sent whatever they had on hand.

It was all a little insulting. A waste of my time (because I am courteous enough to read the stuff and respond to it) and a waste of the writer’s time, as well.

So that was me, one time. I can only imagine what acquisitions editors or literary journal editors must be thinking when these things cross their desks day after day after day. And I can guarantee that none of it is complimentary to the writer.

Do you really want to shoot your literary career in its metaphorical foot? Do you really want your name to be associated with slapdash work, with not being cooperative, with being difficult? Listen, it’s hard enough to get published as it is. Do you really want to make it that much harder?

Trust me: they’re not going to discover your fine literary talent hidden in the midst of your inappropriate submission. It isn’t going to happen. So consider going back to basics: read the call for submissions, submit exactly what they ask you for, no more and no less, and behave like a professional. And then you’ll be … beyond the elements of style!