Pen
The fascination of
words and writing
 

Archive for December, 2007

Who or Whom? A Quick Cheatsheet

Saturday, December 29th, 2007

It comes up in working with clients and students alike, and over the holidays my stepdaughter asked me when to use “whom” versus “who” in writing. (There was no point in asking which ought to be used in speaking: she is thirteen, and firmly entrenched in the Sullen Adolescent Communication Syndrome, which appears to involve much more grunting, hissing, and gesturing than it does actual words.)

I gave Anastasia my standard explanation, after which she said, “huh?”

So here is my who/whom cheatsheet: for Anastasia, for students, for clients, for anyone who needs it: don’t think in terms of rules, think in terms of substitution.

And the general usage is, if you can substitute “she” for the troublesome word in the sentence, you should use “who.” If you can substitute “her,” the word should be “whom.”

Here’s an example: “Who/whom was supposed to walk the dog this morning?” Make it a statement: would you say, “She was supposed to walk the dog this morning,” or “Her was supposed to walk the dog this morning”? Clearly she; clearly who.

“To whom/whom were you speaking?” can easily be answered: “I was speaking to her,” therefore, “whom” is the correct word in that context.

There’s nothing wrong with a grammatical cheatsheet, as long as it points the user to better grammar usage! And by now I’m hoping that it will help Anastasia be … beyond the elements of style!

Alphabet Soup, Anyone?

Wednesday, December 26th, 2007

Okay, count me in with the old fogies, the curmudgeons, those who speak of the good old days (even when, lurking in the backs of our minds, is the sure knowledge that there never was any such thing).

I love email. I love the fact that I don’t have to wait days or weeks for replies to questions I send out. I love the fact that I can email twice as many people in half the time it used to take me to write a note by hand or typewriter.

But … but. There’s email, which is a semi (at least) articulate form of communication, where typos may exist but are regarded with friendly acceptance, and yet which obey the general grammatical and stylistic rules to which we have all become accustomed.

And then there’s text-messaging-speech.

A member on a list to which I subscribe writes incessantly in text-message format. It’s not the silly abbreviations that bother me as much as the punctuation (or lack thereof) that follows no rule with which I am familiar, an almost complete absence of capital letters, and a rigorousness of thought to match.

It’s like reading messages written with alphabet cereal … in the bowl.

Perhaps as we move toward a new year we can remember that the point of all this is communication, and that rules of grammar and usage are in place for a reason: to facilitate said communication. And then we’ll be … beyond the elements of style!

Don't Let The Spammers Stop You

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

I wrote in a previous article about subject lines, and how spammers are making it more and more difficult to find one that works.

And now we have Second Life, with which I’m intimately acquainted, as I co-author a site, SecondSeeker.com, that reviews places in Second Life that new (and not-so-new) residents might wish to visit. And as I move about that particular virtual world, I’m struck again and again by the names that people acquire.

I should digress to say that one has a limited choice of both first and surnames in Second Life, unless one wishes to pay a significant amount of money to keep or choose one’s own. Otherwise, it’s pretty much mix-and-match with what’s available, and with millions of residents, fewer and fewer “good” names are available.

The fact is that most of them sound like the friendly bots who bring you your daily serving of spam: Hammond Gillnose, Tarteru Higglebottom, Sally Tennyfeathers, Brice Haiku.

Creative … or confusing?

Remember Lewis Carroll? In The Hunting of the Snark, he writes,

His intimate friends called him “Candle-ends,” And his enemies “Toasted-cheese.”

The Internet has changed the way that we look at a lot of things, and we’d do well to learn its lessons. But let’s not let that keep us from being creative – with subject lines, names, or indeed anything else in which we engage.

And then we’ll all be … beyond the elements of style!