Pen
The fascination of
words and writing
 

Archive for October, 2007

To Be Edited … or Not To Be Edited?

Wednesday, October 31st, 2007

Okay, so here’s the thing. No one likes being edited. Any author, any writer who tells you that he or she enjoys the process, is lying. That’s all that there is to it.

Second truth: everyone needs to be edited. Everyone. Every writer has idiosyncracies at best and errors at worst, and there is no way that the writer can be aware of them all. The fact is that one editor probably won’t be aware of them all, either, but he or she has a lot better chance of it than does the writer.

So where does that leave you?

You’ve written your book. You’re about to embark on a search for an agent or publisher. You decide that the first thing to do is to get it — your masterpiece, that is — professionally edited. Right?

Wrong.

I’m not saying that your book doesn’t need editing; au contraire, I’m quite willing to bet that it needs a lot of editing. But that same amount of editing is also going to be very expensive, and it may not be the best use of your funds at this time.

Instead, consider this: what you really want to do is capture the attention and interest of a literary agent or of a publisher. That’s your real goal here, not having a picture-perfect manuscript.

What will you be sending out in your quest for arousing that interest? Certainly not the entire manuscript! Instead, you’ll be sending out a proposal, which will include — at most — three chapters of the manuscript. It will also include other essentials, such as a synopsis, an analysis of competing books already in the marketplace, a statement of your platform, an outline, and other components.

You’re starting to get the idea: I can tell. Your first order of business is to make this proposal the best proposal it can possibly be. So by all means have it edited — and have those first three chapters edited, also — and hold off on the whole manuscript until someone has asked you to send it to them.

You can have someone write the proposal — it’s one of the things that I do for clients — but that’s relatively expensive. Consider writing your own and then sending it to a top-notch editor. You’ll pay up to a couple thousand dollars, but you won’t be in for too much; and if no one asks for it (perish the thought!), you’ll still be able to pay next month’s rent!

And then you’ll be … beyond the elements of style!

It's So Mysterious …

Saturday, October 27th, 2007

I have to admit: it’s my favorite genre. In fact, I’d rather be curled up with a good mystery — preferably an English country-house murder, a la Dorothy Sayers — than do just about anything else.

And at a time when publishers are constantly shrinking their lists and new books remain on bookshop shelves for a mere 15 days before being returned, it’s heartening for me to know that I belong to a tribe whose appetite for mysteries is as insatiable as my own. There’s a thriving market for mystery and detective novels, which hopefully means that they will always be around for people like me to read.

According to Bowker’s Books In Print database, 5,580 new mystery and detective titles and editions were published in the U.S. in 2006. That’s a nine percent increase over 2005 and a 33% increase over 2002. The peak year for the category was 2004, when 5,715 new titles and editions were published.

How does that divide out amongst the various sub-genres that exist within the categry? Of 2006′s 5,580 new mystery and detective titles published …

  • … 22% were mass market editions
  • … 23% were hardcovers
  • … 44% were trade paper editions
  • … 13% were published for children and young adults
  • … 37% were reviewed in at least one source monitored by Bowker
  • … 7% appeared on at least one bestseller list monitored by Bowker

We have to see that as good news, both as readers and as writers. And it’s certainly a bunch of statistics … beyond the elements of style!

What Kind of Index Was That, Again?

Sunday, October 21st, 2007

I’ve been concerned for some time about the statistics: one-third of all Americans — that’s 90 million people, folks — are functionally illiterate. Horrifying.

And those of us who write for a living have to be aware of that, have to know that many of the people who read our words are among that 90 million. That doesn’t mean that we should, necessarily, dumb down what we write; but we do need to be, more than ever, aware of who our audience is, and address that audience in language that will reach them. Long words don’t count for much if they’re not being read.

One tool that I only recently stumbled across is the Gunning fog index. It’s a test that measures the readability of a passage of writing. It reduces all the fine words in that passage to a number, which is singularly unfortunate but possibly inevitable; the number stands for the number of years of education required to easily understand the next on the first reading.

Comic books generally come in at #6, for example, while Newsweek rates a 10 and the Atlantic Monthly a 12.

Am I saying that every writer should use it? Not at all; the algorithm is complex and would take me longer to figure out than it took to write the passage. But it’s something to be aware of … especially in view of the discouraging statistics about literacy and illiteracy.

A little shameless self-promotion: my new book, Open Your Heart with Reading, strongly advocates that everyone who enjoys reading should do some literacy work, of some kind — volunteer, donate, whatever works for you. Because reading is a gift we take for granted … until we’re faced with the Gunning fog index. And who wants to write to an algorithm?

Read every day. And do something to help others read, too. And then you’ll be … beyond the elements of style!